marketer’s perspective on consumer subpoena by esteh indonesia

Hello, OptiMIST People!

Back at it again with KaMIST! Your weekly dose of insights into the latest marketing trends. In this week’s KaMIST we’ll dive into the viral consumer subpoena by Esteh Indonesia.

Lately, the internet has been faced with an uproar by the news of a Twitter user who criticized Esteh Indonesia but ended up being exposed to UU ITE. This event caused the keyword “UU ITE” to become a trending topic on social media. The tweet is alleged to contain insults to PT Esteh Indonesia Makmur. 

Chronologically, this feud began with the tweet of a consumer named Gandhi via the Twitter account @gandhoyy. Gandhi submitted a complaint for one of Esteh Indonesia’s products, namely Chizu Red Velvet, which was considered too sweet. In his upload, Gandhi mentioned that Chizu Red Velvet belonging to Esteh Indonesia contains as much as three kilograms of sugar. Gandhi’s tweet was quickly responded to by @esteh_indonesia, which stated that the information had been sent to their legal team. Following the response to Gandhi’s tweet, Esteh Indonesia also gave a subpoena signed by the legal team, Brian Michael, on Saturday, September 24, 2022. Gandhi finally issued a Twitter apology for his insensitive comment on Sunday, September 25, 2022.

The managing partner of Inventure, Yuswohady, addressed this problem and offered advice on what a business should do in a similar position. He agrees that many brands are experiencing a culture shock related to the current pattern of consumer and producer interactions. He added that since consumers of today have access to information, the world has taken on a horizontal pattern. On public forums, consumers are free to comment on any topic, including brands. Many brands are still unaware of this situation. They thus frequently overreact.

Yuswohady appealed with Esteh Indonesia to revoke their subpoena since it was thought to worsen the issue and further stigmatize the brand. Businesses shouldn’t react angrily to remarks made by online users. Additionally, the business should invite consumers to face-to-face meetings in order to resolve issues like these. The objective is to prevent issues from growing and to enable more professional problem-solving.

Managers understandably want to suppress or downplay negative reviews since they may be particularly harmful to businesses and are a source of concern. In fact, one of the top results for a search on “negative online reviews” on the internet is “how to remove negative online reviews.” This new study questions the assumption that negative reviews are invariably detrimental to a company’s bottom line. In fact, it implies that when consumers genuinely identify with a brand and recognize elements of their personality or identity in the brand, such evaluations could even provide positive results.

According to Ordabayeva, consumers who connect with a brand are more inclined to carefully consider bad evaluations in an effort to shield the brand—and by implication, themselves—from negative feedback. Consumers examine the social proximity of reviewers to themselves in particular, employing a variety of demographic, social, and group aspects to justify ignoring critical comments from socially distant reviewers. In the end, this shields brands that are important to identify from unfavorable comments. Dahl continues, “Negative reviews may even result in advantages for brands compared to favorable ratings. Notably, after favorable evaluations, consumers do not examine reviewer social proximity or resemblance in the same way. Regardless of their socioeconomic standing, they pay attention to such reviews because they always appreciate good comments about themselves and companies that are important to their sense of identity.

Wanna get more insights on marketing? Tune in every Thursday for more KaMIST!

You can reach us at:

LINE: @mistfebui

Instagram: @mistfebui

Twitter: @mistfebui

Facebook: MIST FEB UI

#optiMIST

The idea of delivering the most value for the consumer has evolved over the years. As we know, the best marketing strategy is cetera desunt for adaptive future-leader mindset that uncertainly evolved over decades. Companies began to use various promises in effort to persuade and attract customers. The fiercely increasing conditions of competition added the popularity of the concept of “brand” and “advertisement” by adopting the concept of neo-marketing and elaborate them with psychological terms. Albeit, all emotion influences consumers personal relationships, business choices, and buying decisions. The emotion itself has situational and reactive qualities, as well as satisfaction and expectations formed over lifetimes of experiences and interactions.

When a boy goes to an ice cream parlor or restaurant, he will feel befuddled. Choosing what he is going to get, that’s the thing that he despises. Would chocolate chip or strawberry ice cream please him better? Cheeseburger or fried chicken? He feared that what he selected will not give him as much pleasure as the other option would give. What he doesn’t choose could provide a higher sense of pleasure than the one he chose. One interesting finding utilized by neuromarketing is that people really don’t want to lose out. People are just as worried about what they might lose as to what they might gain.
In the meantime, one of the biggest challenges that marketers deal with is customers’ expectations in the pre-purchase phenomenon where the consumers haven’t fixed their buying decision yet. To tackle the challenge, many companies are competing to build relationships with their customers, with the expectations that they will be able to provide the best customer experience for specific individuals. Therefore, the company must be customer-centric to carry out a successful marketing strategy in order to be noticed by consumers and to forge a brand identity.

According to McKinsey (2019), by making a fundamental change of mindset of focusing on the customers, companies gained significant enhancement on several aspects. Along with operational and IT improvements, companies generate 20 to 30 percent uplift in customer satisfaction, a 10 to 20 percent improvement in employee satisfaction, and economic gains ranging from 20 to 50 percent of the cost base addressed in the various journeys.

To overcome these challenges, companies have to understand consumers’ behavior and expectations. Hence, companies should put a bigger concern towards consumers’ buying-cycle from awareness to its advocacy. By implementing the concept of Neuromarketing, stereotypes of the communication matters of the marketing basis will be integrated with taste of individual market itself. The more personalized the promotion, the higher the probability that the advertisement will work. It could be done by using big data to allow the company for this huge aggregation of all consumers personal information that they’ve ever revealed to build a precise representation of who they are, now, more than ever before. Data and insight are not delivered to consumers as a whole but individually by delivering the most value to the customers with a very specific scope based on how they think.

In order to win in today’s marketplace, companies must be customer-centered, to the point that ideally, each individual customer’s values are taken into an account to derive the value that they are truly seeking. In essence, by generating consumer reactions, and treating them not as reactionary receptacles of marketing strategies, but as each their own person with differing individual values. Therefore, reinforcing belief is a very important matter for marketers that influences consumers experience. They must deliver superior value to their target customers traditionally and digitally with knowledge of neuroscience marketing strategies combined. Neuromarketing will surely strengthen customer’s contentment of a product itself.